Are We Still America?

Submitted by WilliamSB on Sun, 03/26/2006 - 9:04pm.
President George W. Bush is in a hard place right now. He proposed a work visa for immigrant workers, allowing them to stay and work in the United States a few years only to be deported at the end of their visa.

On the other hand, "conservative law-and-order" Republicans are arguing to defend, well, "law and order"; a fallacious argument, by the way, since we're talking about legislators making law, not prosecutors defending law. For that matter, being illegal is currently a "violation", not a felony. This is much like a municipal "violation," like spitting on the sidewalk. The "law-and-order" folks are emotionally defending the equivilent of a law that bans spitting on a sidewalk! (that is, until they successfully turn the "violation" into a "felony").

Well, this is not reality TV folks, with a sexy musical theme thrumbing in the background. Real people are involved in this argument and real people face the consequences of this argument. I would invite anyone paying attention to read, "Grapes of Wrath."

The truth is, Bush is caught between Repbulicans, on the one hand, who want to screw people over; and Republicans, on the other hand, who want to screw people over. Interesting choice... which way do you go?

On the one hand are the "business-minded" Repbulicans who enjoy the exploitable labor. They want the immigrants here so they can have a cheap labor force; a labor force, by the way, which, because of its exploitability, contributes to keeping everyone else's wages down.

On the other hand are the Repbulicans who want to fear-monger everyone into turning innocent people looking for a better life into criminals. The same Republicans, under this new Bill, want to turn christian churches who provide humanitarian aide into criminals. Ministers and faith community members can be turned into instant felons, under this new Bill, just for giving food and/or a place to sleep to illegal immigrants.

Which way do you go?

Neither is correct. America, the Land of Immigrants, does not turn its back on people seeking a better life. Nor do we properly exploit the labor of people seeking a better life.

But what a nation we've become... a nation balancing between corporate greed and fundamentalist stupidity.

Are we still America?
Submitted by Tim H (not verified) on Sun, 04/02/2006 - 1:58pm.

Anticipating this difficult and critical situation regarding immigration policy, the U.S. Catholic Bishops launched the Justice for Immigrants campaign last year. I highly recommend this website for helpful information and moral principles for understanding these complex issues: http://www.justiceforimmigrants.org/

If you want to dig deeper, in 2003, the bishop's released an excellent pastoral letter regarding immigrants entitled Strangers No Longer: Together on the Journey of Hope: http://www.usccb.org/mrs/stranger.shtml

Submitted by Unregistered (not verified) on Wed, 05/17/2006 - 10:20am.

An Immigrant is a person who comes to this country legally not illegallly and I am supporting President Bush on this - I do not see it as amnesty. For the 12 million illegals that are already here- I like the plan. Please, my tax dollars should not go to support people that want to break the law. Please do not insult my relatives who were LEGAL immigrants - came here the hard way and yet made America their home by working hard to be an American citizen and not expecting anyone to know their language (they learned ours). Not expecting anyone to assimilate into their culture (they learned ours). Doesn't our catechism even state that breaking the law is a sin? We certainly do not want to encourage people to sin, do we?

Submitted by mike on Tue, 05/30/2006 - 11:44am.

I have never understood the stubborn sentiment of some Americans that we are too good to learn any language beside English. Does it stem from pride ("Our language is better than yours,") or sloth ("We're too lazy to learn your language, so you better learn ours")?

For that matter, how exactly is it "our language" anyway? We speak English and yet we are not in England. If it was truly "our language" wouldn't it be called "American?" ...Well, I suppose our president has refered to it as such... If you really want to approach the issue from a linguistic perspective, the English language originated from German. So how is it "our language?" It seems like both Germany and England may have a stronger claim to "our language" than we do.

And here's a real can of worms: What alphabet do you suppose our alphabet (strangely called the Roman alphabet, not the American alphabet) originated from? Get ready for this... Arabic! Take a moment of digest that one. Our 26-letter written language actually evolved from the alphabet still in use today in all of those controversial Middle Eastern nations like Iraq, Iran, and Afganistan, to name a few. Of course, our alphabet, the Roman alphabet, is the same one used in much of South America, Central America, and Europe, all of which contribute heavily to U.S. immigration.

It seems that language is a fairly universal concept after all. Catholic Mass, for example, is spoken in hundreds of languages across the globe, but at one time was said in Latin everywhere. I would have to imagine that before that, in the church's earliest days, it was spoken in the ancient languages like Hebrew and Aramaic, as well.

I have always thought of bilingualism or multilingualism as a sign of intellect and education. Why then are some Americans so vehemently opposed to furthering their education? I myself have never became fluent in a second language. My education and career path took me in the direction of science, and I simply could not devote adequate time to learning a foreign language... And I'm not at all proud of that! If anything, I'm slightly embarassed that many people, American citizens and foreigners, can speak "my language" and I cannot speak "theirs."

Here is my case: If we live in America, and America is a combination of people from so many different cultures and languages around the world, why then is the white European culture (and language) the "right one?" I think that is only a fraction of the whole that is America. What about cultural contributions from African Americans? from South and Central Americans? from Native Americans (after all, they were here first)?

Why the proud refusal to accept any languages or cultures besides "ours?" Is it anything more than a stubborn clinging to ignorance? Perhaps the only thing more dangerous than ignorance is pride in ignorance.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment



The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


*

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.