| William Burnett (25) | |
| TimH (6) | |
| Bible Buck (3) | |
| Timshipe (2) | |
| Admin (1) | |
| Michael J Miller (1) |
Cindy Sheehan -- whose tireless efforts to pursue meaning and justification for her son's death in Iraq made her the face of the peace movement -- stepped out of her active role in the anti-war movement on Memorial Day.
Cindy signed out of her campaign in a letter she posted in her blog at DailyKos.com. To prevent loss of this letter, I uploaded a .pdf version of it to our server. It can be found here.
This is a letter written by a woman who has been through hell and back. Cindy comes across broken and disillusioned; and she deserves our prayers and support.
I am not upset that Cindy is stepping down from her active role in the peace movement. People often burn out in justice work; even without having sacrificed so much. Cindy has given up everything to be a standard-bearer of peace and accountability. How many among the peace movement can really say that? Cindy has galvanized the timid and moved the hesitant. Now she deserves her rest.
The vitriol which Cindy had to put up with -- and which still gets slung her way -- is reprehensible. The peace movement we see today consists of coalitions representing diverse ranges of groups; not all of which are solely or even primarily motivated by the desire to promote peace. There are groups which pursue justice at a broader spectrum. Then you have groups which have their own particular causes, and which find the peace movement to be an unprecedented opportunity to attract attention to those respective causes. And, let's not forget the young anarchist, neo-hippie wanna-be groups who simply want an excuse for excitement and rebellion. Then there are groups of ordinary citizens who just want what Cindy wanted: either justify this war or end it.
Coalition work is always the hardest to do. You have to negotiate conflicting agendas and personalities -- not only of people, but of groups -- while sustaining a determined focus on the purpose of the coalition. Very often those coalitions break down. And people can become frustrated -- and, at times, embittered -- in the process of moving a coalition. I know community organizers who avoid coalitions like the plague.
In this case, I strongly suspect most of those from the so-called progressive community throwing the most vitriol at Cindy are those who had their own agendas and desires to attract attention to those agendas by attaching them to the peace movement. Cindy should let that be what it is and take time to recover.
I think the greatest contribution Cindy has made to the peace movement was to forcefully remind Catholics of our role in evaluating the merits of war and peace; and to promote justice. Prior to Cindy coming onto the scene, it was way too easy for those among the Falwell-isized circles of the American Catholic community to give lip service to the prudential judgment of our President and not take seriously our responsibility as American citizens to hold our elected government accountable. Cindy reminded us that the President's prudential judgment is accountable to the people -- and accountable to justice. (Cindy, by the way, is Catholic).
There are many sides to the debate around the Iraq War; some having more merit than others. I am obviously of the position that this war was illegitimate from day one; and that it needs to end sooner rather than later. I give Cindy my sincere thanks for being the standard-bearer in promoting peace.
Comments
Worse than I thought
I was saddened when I decided to take a look at The Anchoress blog, voted the #1 Catholic blog for political/social commentary. This post on Cindy Sheehan just saddened me. It claims to have her interests at heart, to feel compassion for her, but the tone is a different story. It cannot, I feel, even be described as a "tough love" sort of tone, but rather mockery.
I have never read The Anchoress blog before and am in no position to speak on her other writing, but I feel sorry to learn that this is considered the #1 Catholic political commentary. In particular, I was struck by her wholehearted support for U.S. foreign policy, which seems to me to be directly at odds with Catholic teaching on peace and the international community:
"Your son’s honorable death is being cheapened by the people who would say, 'I support the troops, so I want them to be pulled out of a the place where they can make a difference, and have them stop acting like the warriors they are, so we can all sing Kumbaya and pretend to be friends with the whole world…until they attack another US City, in which case we should all beg their pardon and ask them why they hate us and how we can change to be more what they’d like.'"
Compare with the teaching of the Church (cited on Vox Nova):
496. Violence is never a proper response. With the conviction of her faith in Christ and with the awareness of her mission, the Church proclaims “that violence is evil, that violence is unacceptable as a solution to problems, that violence is unworthy of man. Violence is a lie, for it goes against the truth of our faith, the truth of our humanity. Violence destroys what it claims to defend: the dignity, the life, the freedom of human beings”.[1029]
The contemporary world too needs the witness of unarmed prophets, who are often the objects of ridicule.[1030] “Those who renounce violence and bloodshed and, in order to safeguard human rights, make use of those means of defence available to the weakest, bear witness to evangelical charity, provided they do so without harming the rights and obligations of other men and societies. They bear legitimate witness to the gravity of the physical and moral risk of recourse to violence, with all its destruction and death”.[1031]
Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church #496
Right and wrong
Like many Catholics, I am an admirer of Cindy Sheehan. Like many of her admirers, I have done very little to help her stop this war. Even the little bit I've done-a few marches, a few posts, a few letters- has been more than many other Catholics. I am not sure why American Catholics have listened more to Fox News and other cheerleaders of this war than we have to the hierarchy who have spoken forcefully against it. I think most of us are too secular--the Vatican and Bishops are out of our field of vision. At the same time, preachers and leaders often stay away from commenting on the war because it is political. In Catholic teaching, however, war is a moral decision. It is true that government officials and voters ("those who have responsibility for the common good") are given the "prudential judgment" for evaluating conditions for war, but the fact that decisions are made in the political sphere does not demean their moral dimension. Catechism#2309 The cliche applies: It's not right and left--It's right and wrong.
This war has been wrong from the start, and we have been wrong for not screaming louder, not marching more, not helping people like Cindy Sheehan.