Catholics for Democracy - Revive your faith. Renew our democracy.

Welcome!

All Christians and all people of good will welcome here! Visit our Welcome Page.

User login

· Create new account
· Request new password

Catholics' Guide to Politics

Resources
Key Church Documents
- your entry here
Issues
- your entry here
Politicians
- your entry here
Related Topics
- your entry here

What is this?

Blogs

· [Draft] Resources
· Holy See Pleased that Kidnapped Archbishop is Released
· For All The Wrong Reasons
· Celebrate Martin Luther King
· MoveOn's social Security Petition
· Who Has Abortions and What it Means for us
· The Awakening of Democrats?
· Tim Roemer for DNC Chair
· "Under God?" Asking the big questions
· Catholic Republicans becoming a more familiar sight on the Hill

Upcoming events

Inauguration (and Protests) (1 day)
March for Life (inc. Dems for Life) (5 days)
Republican Meetup (8 days)
Democracy for America Meetup (14 days)
Democratic Party Meetup (20 days)

Essential Links

Latest from the Vatican
US Catholic Bishops
Pax Christi USA
NETWORK Catholic Lobby
Democrats for Life
Catholic Relief Services
Sojourners

other links

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 2 guests online.

Who's new

· c1gf
· frankrizzo
· lowellmj5
· Micksman
· Brian Burke

Comment Posting Rules

Statement about posting blog statements or responses at CfD.

Syndicate

Even Jane Fonda apologized. Will you, John?

Comment added by Unregistered on Fri 10 Sep 2004 - 06:57 h

Townhall.com
Column written by Oliver North in response to John Kerry's
phrase, "Bring it on."
August 27, 2004 |

"Of course, the president keeps telling people he would never
question my service to our country. Instead, he watches as a
Republican-funded attack group does just that. Well, if he wants to
have a debate about our service in Vietnam, here is my answer: 'Bring it
on.'" -- Sen. John Kerry

Dear John,

As usual, you have it wrong. You don't have a beef with President
George Bush about your war record. He's been exceedingly generous about your
military service. Your complaint is with the 2.5 million of us who
served honorably in a war that ended 29 years ago and which you, not
the president, made the centerpiece of this campaign.

< I talk to a lot of vets, John, and this really isn't about your
medals or how you got them. Like you, I have a Silver Star and a Bronze Star.
I only have two Purple Hearts, though. I turned down the others so that I
could stay with the Marines in my rifle platoon. But I think you might
agree with me, though I've never heard you say it, that the officers
always got more medals than they earned and the youngsters we led never
got as many medals as they deserved.

< This really isn't about how early you came home from that war,
either, John. There have always been guys in every war who want to go home.
There are also lots of guys, like those in my rifle platoon in Vietnam,
who did a full 13 months in the field. And there are, thankfully, lots
of young Americans today in Iraq and Afghanistan who volunteered to
return to war because, as one of them told me in Ramadi a few weeks
ago, "the job isn't finished."

< Nor is this about whether you were in Cambodia on Christmas Eve,
1968.

Heck John, people get lost going on vacation. If you got lost, just say
so. Your campaign has admitted that you now know that you really
weren't in Cambodia that night and that Richard Nixon wasn't really president
when you thought he was. Now would be a good time to explain to us how
you could have all that bogus stuff "seared" into your memory --
especially since you want to have your finger on our nation's nuclear
trigger.

< But that's not really the problem, either. The trouble you're having,
John, isn't about your medals or coming home early or getting lost --
or even Richard Nixon. The issue is what you did to us when you came home,
John.

< When you got home, you co-founded Vietnam Veterans Against the War
and wrote "The New Soldier," which denounced those of us who served -- and
were still serving -- on the battlefields of a thankless war. Worst of
all, John, you then accused me -- and all of us who served in Vietnam
--
of committing terrible crimes and atrocities.

< On April 22, 1971, under oath, you told the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee that you had knowledge that American troops "had personally
raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable
telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up
bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion
reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned
food stocks, and generally ravaged the country side of South Vietnam." And
you admitted on television that "yes, yes, I committed the same kind of
atrocities as thousands of other soldiers have committed."

< And for good measure you stated, "(America is) more guilty than any
other body, of violations of (the) Geneva Conventions ... the torture
of prisoners, the killing of prisoners."

< Your "antiwar" statements and activities were painful for those of us
carrying the scars of Vietnam and trying to move on with our lives. And
for those who were still there, it was even more hurtful. But those who
suffered the most from what you said and did were the hundreds of
American prisoners of war being held by Hanoi. Here's what some of them
endured because of you, John:

< Capt. James Warner had already spent four years in Vietnamese custody
when he was handed a copy of your testimony by his captors. Warner says
that for his captors, your statements "were proof I deserved to be
punished." He wasn't released until March 14, 1973.

< Maj. Kenneth Cordier, an Air Force pilot who was in Vietnamese
custody for 2,284 days, says his captors "repeated incessantly" your one-liner
about being "the last man to die" for a lost cause. Cordier was
released March 4, 1973.

< Navy Lt. Paul Galanti says your accusations "were as demoralizing as
solitary (confinement) ... and a prime reason the war dragged on." He
remained in North Vietnamese hands until February 12, 1973.

< John, did you think they would forget? When Tim Russert asked about
your claim that you and others in Vietnam committed "atrocities,"
instead of standing by your sworn testimony, you confessed that your
words "were a bit over the top." Does that mean you lied under oath? Or
does it mean you are a war criminal? You can't have this one both ways,
John. Either way, you're not fit to be a prison guard at Abu Ghraib,
much less commander in chief.

< One last thing, John. In 1988, Jane Fonda said: "I would like to say
something ... to men who were in Vietnam, who I hurt, or whose pain I
caused to deepen because of things that I said or did. I was trying to
help end the killing and the war, but there were times when I was
thoughtless and careless about it and I'm ... very sorry that I hurt
them. And I want to apologize to them and their families."

< Even Jane Fonda apologized. Will you, John?

Cry of the Poor

"How can it be that even today there are still people dying of hunger? Condemned to illiteracy? Lacking the most basic medical care? Without a roof over their heads? . . .

"Christians must learn to make their act of faith in Christ by discerning His voice in the cry for help that rises from this world of poverty."
-- Pope John Paul II
Novo Millennio Ineunte, no. 50

Support CfD

Give to the only effort I know of to find and support fully Catholic candidates. Your contribution will pay for this website to continue, and for expanded outreach efforts as we build toward next election.

Or, pledge your support (time, prayer, spreading the word, etc.) by signing our petition.

Government Websites

The White House
U.S. Congress
U.S. Supreme Court
Republican Party
Democratic Party
Other Parties...

Relevant Catholic Weblogs

In Today's News: Progressive Catholic reflections
Disputations: Disciplined Catholic thought

Grassroots Politics: DFA

· Fortune Favors the Bold
· Daily News Roundup
· Oklahoma, Mississippi and Utah Democratic Party Leadership Join Florida in Endorsing Gov. Howard Dean for DNC Chair
· One Step Closer in KY
· Florida DNC Members Unanimously Choose Dean
· There's a Party Goin' On Right Here ...
· Touring Birmingham
· Rapid Response: Dr. King's Impact
· The Legacy of Dr. King
· Concord Monitor Endorses Dean

BBC News | Americas

· Rice quizzed over US Iraq policy
· Baseball: Clemens asks for $22m
· Saudis cleared from 9/11 lawsuits
· Rice grilled over US Iraq policy
· Peru PM survives censure vote
· Global poll slams Bush leadership
· Advertising boom boosts Yahoo
· New models up Motorola earnings
· US man admits Iraq oil charge
· New models boost Motorola profits

FactCheck.org

· Social Security Ads: Risk or Protection?
· FactCheck Subscribers Find Us Clear, Unbiased, Reliable and Useful
· Update: FactCheck.org Subscriber Survey
· FactCheck.org Subscriber Survey
· The Whoppers of 2004
· NRA Ad Falsely Accuses Kerry
· Kerry and Bush Mislead Voters With Promises of Energy Independence
· Would Kerry Throw Us To The Wolves?
· $8 Million Worth Of Distortions
· An Avalanche of Misinformation

Do Not Be Afraid

Have Mercy On Us
and on the
Whole World